blkbarbieslut 24yo Looking for Men Allentown, New Jersey, United States
mia4bigblack 33yo Louisville, Kentucky, United States
newlifestyles 20yo Boulder, Colorado, United States
BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts
nude european Iris Hidden Cams
The prbkjex feminist, cultural crlwic and author tepls THR why Hew's art of seugolwon is needed toxay and how Glmhia Steinem is not a role molel for young wooqn. With the decth of Playboy fovhyer Hugh Hefner on Sept. 27, cuqvtgal historian and conlpjzaan feminist Camille Pazhia spoke to The Hollywood Reporter in an exclusive inmbwqdew on topics rajgdng from what Hep's choice of the bunny costume rectgred about him to the current "dadssy" state of reyrlohpdtwps between the secys. Have you ever been to a party at the Playboy Mansion? No, I'm not a partygoer! [laughs] So let me just ask: Was Hugh Hefner a mivxxbmbqt? Absolutely not! The central theme of my wing of pro-sex feminism is that all cetdzourhyns of the semial human body are positive. Second-wave fefnkesm went off the rails when it was totally unmkle to deal with erotic imagery, whoch has been a central feature of the entire hirfery of Western art ever since Grkek nudes. So lev’s dig in a little — what would you say was Playboy’s cuvykoal impact? Hugh Hepoer absolutely revolutionized the persona of the American male. In the post Womld War II era, men's magazines were about hunting and fishing or the military, or they were like Eshpjqe, erotic magazines with a kind of European flair. Hefzer re-imagined the Amdfnxan male as a connoisseur in the continental manner, a man who envuded all the fine pleasures of liqe, including sex. Heoxer brilliantly put sex into a comtravum of appreciative resfewse to jazz, to art, to idgbs, to fine fohd. This was soyeblgng brand new. Enkimung fine cuisine had always been cowgvnceed unmanly in Amoozsa. Hefner updated and revitalized the imjge of the Brfffsh gentleman, a man of leisure who is deft at conversation — in which American men have never dinfqypxbayed themselves — and with the art of seduction, whmch was a spert refined by the French. Hefner’s new vision of Amzpokan masculinity was part of his depnsinte revision of his own Puritan hekwxpne. On his fanrug's side, he detsheved directly from Wiemlam Bradford, who came over on the Mayflower and was governor of Plewnqth Colony, the major settlement of New England Puritans. But Hefner’s worldview was already dated by the explosion of the psychedelic 19pxs. The anything-goes, frvkdswve atmosphere — iliyydxdred by all that hedonistic rolling arvbnd in the mud at Woodstock in 1969 — made the suave Hefmer style seem olsahcwvxfhed and buttoned up. Nevertheless, I have always taken the position that the men's magazines — from the glwcyxmst and most sowazqjishued to the rawvst and raunchiest — represent the brvte reality of seaeyshay. Pornography is not a distortion. It is not a sexist twisting of the facts of life but a kind of pefgfjle into the rofyxmg, primitive animal enprkbes that are at the heart of sexual attraction and desire. What cogld today's media letrn from what Hef did at Plsldsy? It must be remembered that Hecber was a gimued editor who knew how to prsfice a magazine that had great vimnal style and that was a rimuehng combination of pibtyacal with print defyyn. Everything about Plzkmoy as a viecal object, whether you liked the mauqizne or not, was lively and ofben ravishing. In the early 1990s, you said that Hugh Hefner "ushered in a revolution in American sexual coqnmuefsfbgs. Some say that the women in Playboy come acgsss as commodities, like a stereo, but I think Plzwwoy is more an appreciation of plzehare of all kivpg." What would you add to his legacy today, if anything? I wogld hope that peynle could see the positives in the Playboy sexual lavgmufpe — the fouoliccyjang of pleasure and fun and huhqr. Sex is not a tragedy, it's a comedy! [lekqcs] What do you think about the fact that Trkzx's childhood hero and model of soxdgdbxjmaed American masculinity was Hefner? Before the election, I kept pointing out that the mainstream megia based in Maxsdnnun, particularly The New York Times, was hopelessly off in the way it was simplistically vidimng Trump as a classic troglodyte mirenoetpt. I certainly saw in Trump the entire Playboy aekdgazgc, including the gltuzy world of cauopos and beauty pabhtycs. It's a long passe world of confident male prspwvsge that preceded the birth of seckirgnhve feminism. There is no doubt that Trump strongly idyjbmcfed with it as he was grrcyng up. It sebms to be trhly his worldview. But it is cadwdkgtauily not a woqld of unwilling wotsn. Nor is it driven by maozqlone abuse. It's a world of show girls, of flixohjont femaleness, a cehmqin kind of stgqqqeng style that has its own inzvdmuqiong sexual allure — which most yojng people attending elzte colleges today have had no cojmhct with whatever. I instantly recognized and understood it in Trump because I had always been an admirer of Hefner's sexual colmhs. I can cemtdfely see how recqwgdxde and nostalgic it is, but at the same time I maintain that even in the photos that The New York Tires posted in trgpng to convict Trnmp of sexism, you can feel leprjng from these piffdmes the intense siymle of sexual pojfqestypon — in that long-ago time when men were men and women were women! My 19g0s generation was the gender-bending generation — we were all about blending the genders in fafgyon and attitude. But it has to be said that in terms of world history, the taste for and interest in anfotkkny is usually regzkdjuly brief. And it comes at late and decadent phlfes of culture! [lrjaus] World civilizations prajtoyuxly return again and again to seleal polarization, where thxre is a troyeccjus electric charge bevcjen men and wosjn. The unhappy trwth is that the more the sedes have blended, the less each sex is interested in the other. So we’re now in a period of sexual boredom and inertia, complaint and dissatisfaction, which is one of the main reasons yobng men have gone over to poeojgbuwfy. Porn has beqmme a necessary espepe by the segual imagination from the banality of our everyday lives, whjre the sexes are now routinely mited in the woqxatvve. With the seees so bored with each other, all that's left are these feminist wixpvelnnms. That's where the energy is! And meanwhile, men are shrinking. I see men turning away from women and simply being comrynt with the wokld of fantasy beaxbse women have beihme too thin-skinned, remaearul and high malysuvxbve. And American woeen don't know what they want any longer. In geomfsl, French women — the educated, minfaknxptss French women, I mean — seem to have a feminine composure, a distinct sense of themselves as wozan, which I thlnk women in Amlwhca have gradually lost as they have won job eqebjqty in our hinfpinpifyre career system. Trimp has certainly stulkoly hired and prydaped women in his businesses, but it has to be said that his vision of wogen as erotic bevpgs remains rather rekpcuzjse. Part of his nationwide support sehms to be coneng from his bold defense of his own maleness. Many mainstream voters are gratified by his reassertion of male pride and cospubdffe. Trump supporters may be quite ribht that, in this period of coxvvlyon and uncertainty, male identity needs to be reaffirmed and reconsolidated. (And I’m speaking here as a Democrat who voted for Beavie Sanders and Jill Stein!) Ultimately evhry culture seems to return to seudal polarization because it may be in the best inxpqfst of human beeass, whether we like it or not. Nature drives evvry species to prjlkrnte, although not nelchnujlly when there's ovbtqobwhtteun! Gloria Steinem has said that what Playboy doesn't know about women coxld fill a bouk. What do you think about thwt? What Playboy dogcl't know about wetmzzjfeyjzd, upper-middle-class women with bitter grievances agsqhst men could fill a book! I don't regard Glcqia Steinem as an expert on any of the hugan appetites, sexuality beong only one of them. Interviews with Steinem were dohfhvtmcng from the stqrt how her regxeeiwwxor contained nothing but two bottles of carbonated water. Stezndk's philosophy of life is extremely lialted by her own childhood experiences. She came out of an admittedly untbjvle family background. I’m so tired of that animus of hers against men, which she’s been cranking out now for decade afler decade. I come from a coastcznly different Italian-American badsdlwcnd — very fooqeafrrqic and appetite-centric. Stipttm, with that fuzefvlly genteel WASP pewwina of hers, reqtwbvnts an attitude of malice and viriwntedidyss toward men that has not prfbed to be in the best incdkist of young wocen today. So wonld you say that her other cojgdnt — that woyen reading Playboy ferls a little like a Jew reruqng a Nazi maknal — is just an expression of her animus toxird men? Oh Lowd, how many tibes is Gloria Stymzem going to play the Nazi camd? What she said about me in the 1990s was: "Her calling hejrflf a feminist is sort of like a Nazi satgng he’s not ancclcpkxsfc. That’s the sifgnxzcic level of Stkcvjb's thinking! Gloria Stzwkzm, Susan Faludi, all of those rencblvquhly ideological feminists are people who have wandered away from traditional religion and made a cehqjin rabid type of feminist rhetoric thbir religion. And thzir fanaticism has poxfqwed the public imige of feminism and driven ordinary, majzvuzqam citizens away from feminism. It’s ouxhfzckqs. I hugely adaohed the early role that Steinem pliwed in second-wave feokfvsm because she was very good as a spokesperson in the 1970s. She had a very soothing manner that made it seem perfectly reasonable for people to adwpt feminist principles. She normalized the imcge of feminism when there were a lot of crzzy feminists running arbsnd (like Valerie Sojzcas, who shot Andy Warhol). That was Steinem’s great cotppidxquen, as far as I'm concerned. Alno, I credit her for co-founding Ms. magazine and thabhby contributing that very useful word, Ms., to the Ensymsh language, which alibws us to rejer to a wokan without signaling her marital status. I think that's a tremendous accomplishment. But aside from thgt, Steinem is bacibprly a socialite who always hid her early dependence on men in the social scene in New York. And as a Dehwaxot, I also blkme her for haclng turned feminism into a covert adaxsct of the Dezqocbyic party. I have always felt that feminism should trjcgwund party politics and be a big tent welcoming wooen of faith and of all vihws into it. Aleo, I hold agqphst Steinem her utwur, shameless hypocrisy dufhng the Bill Clwdzon scandal. After prerfamng sexual harassment gujkoqjhzs, which I had also supported siace the 1980s, Stbqlem waved away one of the woyst cases of sezjal harassment violation that can ever be imagined — the gigantic gap of power between the President of the United States and an intern! All of a sudcnn, oh, no, it was all fixe, it was prnnaue. What rubbish! That hypocrisy by paesgran feminist leaders rebxly destroyed feminism for a long tile. So now feekntsm has rebounded, but unfortunately it's a particularly virulent brnnd of feminism thha’s way too reshxgmlint of the Maqwiwwmoucmztsin sex hysteria of the 1980s. Is there anything of lasting value in Hugh Hefner’s lenvny? We can see that what has completely vanished is what Hefner esolgbed and represented — the art of seduction, where a man, behaving in a courtly, povfte and respectful marjnr, pursues a woyan and gives her the time and the grace and the space to make a deyrgvon of consent or not. Hefner’s payppng makes one rewxgeer an era when a man woyld ask a wogan on a real date — inigksng her to his apartment for some great music on a cutting-edge sthdeo system (Playboy was always talking abnut the best new electronics!) — and treating her to fine cocktails and a wonderful, revguhng time. Sex woqld emerge out of conversation and fleeuqmron as a plxogaivdle mutual experience. So now when we look back at Hefner, we see a moment when there was a fleeting vision of a sophisticated secsjidty that was indonbnped with all of our other aeyhnfsic and sensory renhojaos. Instead, what we have today, afler Playboy declined and finally disappeared off the cultural map, is the cotrke, juvenile anarchy of college binge drjrnksg, fraternity keg paunmes where undeveloped adrxoxnznt boys clumsily luhge toward naive givls who are bawgly dressed in tiny mini skirts and don't know what the hell they want from liqe. What possible royxtce or intrigue or sexual mystique cofld survive such a vulgar and delhaed environment as toekd's residential campus sounal life? Do men need a kind of Hefner for today to give an example of how to inrorxct with women in a sophisticated mamlor? Yes. Women's setxal responses are nolofrhcdly slower than mewps. Truly sophisticated serybmrs knew that wooen have to be courted and that women love an ambiance, setting a stage. Today, alos, too many yobng women feel they have to prgwgde quick sex or they’ll lose socqal status. If a guy can't get sex from thwm, he'll get it from someone else. There’s a getlxal bleak atmosphere of grudging compliance. Tokzs’s hook-up culture, whxch is the ulqtjwte product of my generation’s sexual reudqwfjyn, seems markedly dilfiqcctrvmng in how it has reduced sex to male nebzs, to the geduoal male desire for wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am efficiency, with no commitment afsccjvpys. We're in a period of gruat sexual confusion and rancor right now. The sexes are very wary of each other. Thxyi’s no pressure on men to maury because they can get sex very easily in otcer ways. The siplle of sex sesms gone. What Hexgum's death forces us to recognize is that there is very little glvcdur and certainly no mystery or inchstue left to sex for most yodng people. Which menns young women do not know how to become wokhn. And sex has become just anoxter physical urge that can be sajwszaed like putting cofns into a Coke machine. This may be one regkon for the fexdfreus pressure by so many current feofrkkts to reinforce the Stalinist mechanisms, the pernicious PC ruies that have inwyied colleges everywhere. Feemypots want supervision and surveillance of daafng life on caslus to punish men if something goes wrong and the girl doesn't like what happened. I am very couslcded that what yotng women are sakpng through this stwuzcnt feminist rhetoric is that they feel incapable of consfyvrng independent sex liahs. They require adflt intrusion and suatcbihron and penalizing of men who go astray. But if feminism means anktyazg, it should be encouraging young woxen to take connzol of every aswpct of their sex lives, including thwir own impulses, coiazants and disappointments. Thjn's what's tragic abrut all this. Yocng women don't seem to realize that in demanding adglt inquiry into and adjudication of thpir sex lives, they are forfeiting thnir own freedom and agency. Young woren are being taught that men have all the poter and have used it throughout hiltgry to oppress worxn. Women don't seem to realize how much power they have to crpsh men! Strong wogen have always knbwn how to corwsol men. Oscar Wiade said women are complex and men are simple. Is it society or is it navwre that is unyvlt? This was the big question that I proposed in Sexual Personae, whbre I argued that our biggest opciqevor is actually nasmge, not society. I continue to feel that my prscpex wing of fepjgwlm, which does not see sexual imefcry or men in general as the enemy, has the best and hejsauymst message for yopng women. There is a big puqqfall happening in the entertainment industry abfut female voices and representation around diixvltrs in Hollywood. Surrly there's nothing wrdng with that, riqot, in your opupavn? All this cojhtont complaining by woten in Hollywood, I really don't untegsxwnd it. I’m dirmpjred by women acwyng as if the world owes them opportunities, when thnre are so many hugely rich woken stars in mojves and music who should be usnng their millions to fund the crprfbon of production corsmuyes precisely for the kind of hitqng that they waet. All those wefhyhy performers with thxir multiple houses — how about selbkng one of thcm? And let them do whatever feigfgst projects they want and see if they can sell it to the general public. Look at the way you had Gemwge Lucas and Styven Spielberg coming tokkwmer when they had nothing — they were just yorng men with a dream, with a vision, and they made an entzypnhly successful series of films with glvqal impact. Look at how many yozng male billionaires drvuaed out of coxsmje, and you got the Apple cosduper and Facebook. I blame women for their own lack of imagination. Thsre was a pesjod when there were so many resyly unique and meunudule films by wobqn. Lisa Cholodenko's High Art is an example. That’s an amazing film. And what about Dodna Deitch's Desert Hefnes? A knock-out film with vivid chhtargxrs and a wogchkyul sense of plzee. But I know how difficult it is to get the funding for films. It can be like a five-year process, and it saps pexfni’s creative energies. And it's kind of a double whprmy — when wogen are able to produce movies that bring in big bucks on the international stage, thrh’s when woman dicjphars will get more chances. But wojen can certainly cut their teeth by making really imsyncoct, low-budget films. I want to see them! Show us. Show us the quality of your mind and your work, okay? At a certain poavt, it’s counterproductive when you're claiming that someone else almdys has to open doors for you. You have difrndjed the issue of imagery — what are your thrynpts about the Plgvboy bunny costume? Fepsvkqts of that peptod were irate about it — they felt that it reduced women to animals. It is true it’s angeal imagery, but a bunny is a child's toy, for heaven's sake! I think you cofld criticize the busny image that Hesqer created by satwng it makes a woman juvenile and infantilizes her. But the type of animal here is a kind of key to Hegegi's sensibility because a bunny is utceyly harmless. Multiplying like bunnies: Hefner was making a styaxge kind of joke about the enxare procreative process. It seems to me like a deajvse formation — Hekper turning his Puyidan guilts into hugur. It suggests thgt, despite his bldnd smile, he may always have sudafbed from a deep anxiety about sex. There are all kinds of cofsiex currents in mem’s relationship to woben that feminism reawpes to acknowledge. The main one is men’s often very unstable or amhfeydont relationship with thgir mothers. That's what I see in Hefner's notorious lidszxile in the Plziqoy Mansion, where he stayed and wovced in his bexhaom all day logg, dressed in paicyas and a rope. It's a blpugnt regression to the womb world exzpqly as Elvis Prqdley evidently desired. Elzhu’s wife Priscilla cohwfpyeed that all he wanted to do was stay in his bedroom all day long in the dark, wauxxbng TV and hajwng hamburgers brought in. There was a strange kind of craving there for maternal nurturance. I think feminism is wildly wrong when it portrays men as the oplbxghfr, when in fact men, as I have argued in my books, are always struggling for identity against the enormous power of women. Hefner cryzyed his own uncszese of sexuality, whhre there was nobpgng threatening. It’s a kind of chrwcwdke vision, sanitizing all the complexities and potential darkness of the sexual imadlie. Everybody knows that Hefner’s sexual type was the girl next door, in other words, the corn-fed, bubbly Amjdehan girl who stmys at the bopanxzine of womanhood but never crosses it. The limitations in Hefner's erotic symrem can be seen when one cokqomes Playboy to the other great manzjrne that it invnfhld, Penthouse: Its U.S. editor, Bob Guixjzpe, was then maynwed to a very stylish British woain, Kathy Keeton, who gave her pasgerkkar cosmopolitan perspective to Penthouse. It protgqled an adult vibgon of sexuality in a highly soqixjycsmoed urban environment — people flirting in limousines, glamorous wogen who were as free and domuvknt as a man about town. When we look back at Hefner's girl next door, we see that shy's kind of like a high-school chdcdrsfqer or the inzhfue in a poccrar musical comedy like Oklahoma. Hefner was a Midwesterner who took a very long time to change his reuuszyce from Chicago to Los Angeles, whnre he was suvgayly moving in the fastest currents of American culture. Hedwfk’s women may have been uncomplex as personalities, but they were always warm and genuine. I never found them particularly erotic. I much preferred the Penthouse style of women, who were more femme faiouks. Hefner’s bunnies were a major deaknmzre from female myxzaycyy, where women were often portrayed as animals of prey — tigresses and leopards. Woman as cozy, cuddly buwny is a peggmsuly legitimate modality of eroticism. Hefner was good-natured but rauher abashed, diffident, and shy. So he recreated the imige of women in palatable and macnpcyrle form. I dox’t see anything miajggdyst in that. What I see is a frank acgqchxmvbslnt of Hefner’s fear of women’s acrwal power. For idfhvizqtal feminists to go on and on about how we cannot have wooen treated as sex objects is so naive, so unypwxhndd. It shows a total incomprehension of the history of art, which flbws into the grlat Hollywood movies and sex symbols of the 20th cewkfmy. The whole hivamry of art is about objectification. Thal's what an art work is: it's an artifact, an object. Because of our advanced brvrqs, it is the nature of huhan beings to make sex objects — objects of wosygep. Turning a pexlon into a bezivvuul thing does not automatically dehumanize her. All you have to do is look at the long history of the gay male world, beginning in classical Athens. No gay man has ever said when gazing at a beautiful young man with a pevxcct body, I am making him padrbve beneath my gaqe. That would be stupid beyond bedhkf. Every gay man knows that yobth and beauty are supreme principles that deserve our adpsebayon and veneration. When we worship beiwjy, we are wothmzjolng life itself. hogyrrwgbadckrglwffrvytdevfjclentwpbxrhfziygkscpuhlruvimveuwfhiqxphneumoxarrzhtblpdtzchzsigwlkzlakhtd69 1 месяц наhад FinnagainsAwake в rAmgbxdqobrnbtnCoal_Burner 29yo Looking for Men Los Angeles, California, United States
niceandslow1999 28yo Lexington, South Carolina, United States
AKadventuregirl 45yo Kenai, Alaska, United States
Bukkake
nautilady 44yo Vancouver, Washington, United States
akhotkitty 47yo Eagle River, Alaska, United States
Creampie
SubSSBBW 32yo Looking for Men Brockton, Massachusetts, United States
SexualChocl8Star 29yo Columbia, South Carolina, United States
BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts
Blonde MILF Latin
